SYLLABUS FOR HN 368:


SCIENCE IN
SCIENCE FICTION
ITS USE AND ABUSE





Day/Time: TR 9:30                      Place: Scott Shipp 106
Profs.: Stacey Vargas, Physics (Mallory 266), Alan Baragona, English (SS 224; Preston 201B)
Office Hours:  Vargas—MWF 1:00-2:00           
                          Baragona—MW 11:00-12:00 (in SS); MW 1:00-2:00 (in Preston)

Last modified January 11, 2001

TEXTBOOKS:

Edwin Abbot

Flatland

New American Library

Johannes Kepler

Somnium, or the Astronomy of the Moon

On Reserve

Cyrano de Bergerac

Voyage to the Moon

On Reserve

Jules Verne

From the Earth to the Moon

Bantam

H.G. Wells

The Time Machine

Online

Fred Hoyle

The Black Cloud

Lightyear Press

Carl Sagan

Contact

Pocket Books

Michael Crichton

Timeline

Ballantine

COURSE DESCRIPTION:

What can properly be called "science fiction" (as opposed to fantasy) has existed since the beginning of the Age of Science.  Scientists have used fiction to explain and explore their science, and professional writers have used science to extend the limits of fiction.  But like fraternal twins, science and science fiction often reflect each other imperfectly.  This course will examine the sometimes uneasy relationship between the two.  It will investigate several perennial questions about the genre.  How good is the science in any given work of sci-fi, given the scientific knowledge of the author's time?  Can sci-fi writers ever really anticipate the science of the future?  Is there a relationship between the quality of the science and the quality of the narrative, or must one be sacrificed for the other?  Is there a difference between the work of a sci-fi writer and of a scientist writing sci-fi?  The course will span the entire Age of Science, from the 17th century to the present, including work by Kepler, Verne, Wells, Sagan, and Crichton.  Students will study the history of science by learning what the authors could have known and will explore the nature of narrative and the similarities and differences between scientific and fictive discourse.

REQUIREMENTS:

Leading Class Discussion:

  5%

 

Reading Quizzes:

10%

 

Midterm Exam:

15%

 

Research Project:

Paper—30%

Presentation—10%

Final Exam:

30%

 

POLICIES:

Other than unannounced quizzes, all required work for the course must be submitted in order for students to get a passing grade.  Late work will not be accepted unless students arrange it with the professors well in advance.  Professors reserve the right not to accept late work.

EXPLANATIONS:

Leading Class Discussion: Once during the semester, each student will be part of a small group of two or three assigned to lead the class discussion on the reading for the day.  Assignments will be made early in the course.  General class participation throughout the semester will be a factor in the final grade, as well, especially for borderline grades.

Reading Quizzes: Students will be given standard reading quizzes on the content of the reading on any given day.

Midterm Exam: The midterm exam will consist of both objective questions and a short essay, covering both the reading and lectures on the history of science and literature.

Research Project: Every student will be required to read a work of science fiction not on the syllabus, write a research paper, and give a class presentation on the research of approximately 10 minutes.  See the Project Description at the end of the syllabus.

Final Exam: The final exam will follow the same model as the midterm and will be comprehensive.

COURSE HOME PAGE:

There is a web site for HN 368 at http://www.vmi.edu/gen_ed/Sci&SciFi.html.   The main home page includes bibliographies and other research resources that students can use when they are working on their research project and are preparing to lead class discussion on a work.  There is also a copy of this syllabus.  Any changes to the syllabus made during the semester will be posted to the web site.  It is the students’ responsibility to keep up with the daily reading requirements and to be aware of what is on the syllabus at all times.

 


Reading Schedule

Unless otherwise indicated, read the entire work for the first day of discussion.

T 1/16                 Introduction to the course: requirements, issues

R 1/18                 Flatland, Introduction, Preface and Part I (pp. 7-96)

 

T 1/23                 Flatland, Part II (pp. 99-160)

R 1/25                Intro. to 17th-century literature and science

 

T 1/30                 Kepler’s Dream (on reserve)

R 2/1                   Cyrano’s Voyage to the Moon (on reserve)

 

T 2/6                   Kepler and Cyrano, cont’d.

R 2/8                   Intro to 18th-century science and literature

 

T 2/13                 Discuss handouts of 18th-century material (Defoe, Mercier, etc.)

R 2/15                Intro to 19th-century science and literature

 

T 2/20                 Verne’s From the Earth to the Moon

R 2/22                Verne’s From the Earth to the Moon cont’d.

 

T 2/27                 Midterm exam

R 3/1                   Introduction to 20th-century science

 

T 3/6                   Introduction to 20th-century literature

R 3/8                   Wells’s Time Machine (online)

SPRING FURLOUGH

T 3/20                 Hoyle’s The Black Cloud

R 3/22                Hoyle’s The Black Cloud, cont’d.

 

T 3/27                 Sagan’s Contact, pp. 1- 210

R 3/29                No class for Jonathan Daniels ceremonies

 

T 4/3                   Sagan’s Contact, pp. 211-end

R 4/5                   Science at the end of the 20th century

 

T 4/10                 SPRING FTX

R 4/12                Crichton’s Timeline, pp. ix-252

 

T 4/17                 Crichton’s Timeline, pp. 252-491

R 4/19                 Student presentations

RESEARCH PAPER DUE

 

T 4/24                 Student presentations

R 4/26                Student presentations

 

T 5/1                   Student presentations

R 5/3                   Last class



RESEARCH PROJECT

PAPER

Each student will read a science fiction book (novel or short story collection) outside the course reading list, research the biography of the writer and the scientific and literary context of the work, and write an 8-10 page paper that analyzes the book’s quality in terms of both science and literature.  Students can choose from the list below or can pick a different work as long as they clear it in advance with both Profs. Baragona and Vargas.  Some of the works listed here are out of print, but they are all available either in the VMI or W&L libraries, by interlibrary loan or online.  Some online e-text sites are The University of Virginia Electronic Text Center at http://etext.lib.virginia.edu (we highly recommend that you download the free Microsoft Reader software and use the e-text format so that you can make notes in the text; otherwise, save the text to disk and call it up in Word or WordPerfect so that you can make notes in it as you read), Project Gutenberg at http://promo.net/pg/, and Bartleby.com at http://www.bartleby.net/.

DUE THURSDAY, APRIL 19

PRESENTATION

Each student will give a class presentation of approximately 10 minutes that summarizes the research and analysis in the paper.  Since everyone will give a presentation, each student should do a different book.  There will be a sign up deadline early in the semester.

BOOK LIST

Cyrano de Bergerac, Voyage to the Sun

Daniel Defoe, The Consolidator

Sebastien Mercier, Memoirs of the Year Two Thousand Five Hundred

Mary Shelley, Frankenstein

Jules Verne, Off on a Comet OR Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea OR Journey to the

Center of the Earth

H.G. Wells, The War of the Worlds OR First Men in the Moon

Any fiction work by Isaac Asimov

Fred Hoyle, A for Andromeda

Poul Anderson, Tau Zero

Larry Niven, Flatlander or Ringworld

Arthur Clarke, 2001 OR 2010 OR 2061

Hal Clement, Mission of Gravity

Dionys Burger, Sphereland

A.K. Dewdney, Planiverse

Robert L. Forward, Indistinguishable from Magic


Work for Grade: Cadets' responsibilities

"Work for grade" is defined as any work, whether written or oral, that is presented to an instructor for a grade.  All work submitted for grade is considered the cadet's own work, whether or not he or she has indicated that it is "certified." "Cadet's own work" means that he or she has composed the work from his or her general accumulation of knowledge and skill and that it has been composed especially for the current assignment.  No work previously submitted in any course will be resubmitted for grade in a current course without the specific approval of the instructor.  The cadet is referred to the VMI-authorized handbook for rules concerning quotations, paraphrases, and documentation, and to his or her instructor for requirements on identifying sources used on certified assignments.

If a cadet has received help on work submitted for grade from sources other than those specifically authorized, he or she must write "HELP RECEIVED" conspicuously on his or her written work (or, at the beginning of an oral presentation, state that he or she has received help), and he or she must explain the nature of the help received. Admission of help received may result in a lower grade but will not result in prosecution for an honor violation.

               Cadets  are certified in regard to the contents of a quiz/exam until it is returned to them. Certification, in this case, means that they cannot talk to anyone, except the instructor, about the contents of the quiz/exam.  This enjoinder does not imply that any inadvertent expression or behavior that might indicate one’s feeling about the test should be considered a breach of the certification.  The real issue is whether individuals received information, not available to everyone else in the class, which would give them an unfair advantage.  If an individual inadvertently gives or receives information, the incident must be reported.

Each cadet is responsible for familiarizing himself or herself thoroughly with the policies stated in this section, with any supplementary statement posted by the academic department offering a course he or she is taking, and with any policies stated by his or her instructor.  If he or she has any doubt about the correct interpretation of a policy, he or she should consult the instructor offering the course. The violation by a cadet of any of these policies will, if he or she is found guilty, result in his or her being dismissed from VMI.  His or her ignorance of the correct interpretation of these policies is no excuse.